Here’s a question that splits churches: “Can a prophecy be from God and still be wrong?”
A lot of people online answer that question badly. Some say, “God never speaks through people anymore, so stop asking.” Others say, “If it felt like God, then whatever happened is God’s fault too.” Both answers skip the hard work. This post is the first in a series that tries to do the hard work instead.
Start With the One Thing We Can’t Give Up
Before we talk about mistakes, we need a firm floor to stand on: God does not lie, and God does not get things wrong.
The Bible says this plainly. Numbers 23:19 says God is not a man, that he should lie. Hebrews 6:18 says it’s impossible for God to lie. If a message truly comes from God, with nothing added or lost along the way, that message is true. Full stop.
So when someone says “God told me this,” and it turns out to be false, we have exactly two options. Either it wasn’t really from God, or something happened to it after it left God and before it reached other people. There is no third option where God is the one who made the mistake.
This matters because a lot of internet debates never get this far. People argue about whether a specific prophet was right or wrong, but they never stop to ask where the error could have possibly entered the picture. That question is the whole point of this project.
The Word “Prophecy” Is Doing Two Different Jobs
Here’s something most casual conversations miss: the Bible uses the word “prophecy” for two very different things.
One is canonical prophecy — the prophetic books of the Old Testament, the words of Jesus, and the writings the church recognized as Scripture. Second Peter 1:20-21 says no prophecy of Scripture came from a person’s own idea. Instead, prophets spoke from God as the Holy Spirit carried them along. That word “carried” is important. It’s the same idea used for a ship being carried by wind. The human writer wasn’t steering. The Spirit was.
The other is noncanonical prophecy — a personal word, a message during a church service, a prediction posted online. This kind of prophecy is common in Pentecostal and charismatic churches today, and it’s the kind that causes all the arguments. First Corinthians 14:29 tells the church what to do with this kind of prophecy: “Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said.” You don’t weigh something you’re supposed to accept without question. You weigh something that might have flaws in it.
Scholar Wayne Grudem built much of his career on this exact distinction. He argues that New Testament congregational prophecy was never treated as equal to Scripture, even in the earliest churches, precisely because Paul tells everyone to test it. D. A. Carson makes a similar point in his study of 1 Corinthians 12-14: the gift of prophecy in the church age comes with a built-in system of checking, something Scripture itself never needed. Craig Keener adds that this doesn’t make the gift fake. It makes it a real but limited form of communication, given to ordinary, sinful, forgetful people.
Why This Isn’t Just an Academic Argument
This distinction shows up constantly in current debates. In December 2025, The Remnant Radio released a follow-up episode responding to a critique from Corey Minor of the Smart Christians channel, working through whether a “true prophet” can ever miss a word. Big chunks of that conversation kept circling back to exactly this issue: is a mistaken personal prophecy proof that God spoke falsely, or proof that a person misheard, misapplied, or over-stated something they received?
That’s not a small technical point. It changes how a church responds when a prophecy fails. If you think a wrong prophecy proves God lied, you’re stuck. Either you deny the failure happened, or you start doubting whether God speaks at all. But if you understand the failure as something that can happen at the human end of the pipeline, you have real options: you can name what went wrong, correct it, and keep practicing the gift responsibly.
What This Series Will Do
Over the next six posts, we’ll build out a full model of how a genuine word from God can end up flawed by the time it reaches other people. We’ll look at:
- The specific stages where things go wrong — hearing, interpreting, applying, remembering, and reporting a message
- Hard test cases like Acts 21 and Nathan’s advice to King David in 2 Samuel 7
- Why the early church, and the church today, is commanded to weigh prophetic words instead of just accepting them
- What a healthy, workable prophecy policy looks like for a real congregation
- What repentance should look like when a public prophecy turns out to be false
- How this model helps us evaluate the prophecy debates happening right now on YouTube, from the Remnant Radio and Corey Minor exchange to questions swirling around figures like Mike Bickle and the Kansas City Prophets movement
The goal isn’t to shut down every charismatic practice, and it isn’t to hand out a blank check to every person who claims a word from God. It’s to give churches a clear, honest, biblically grounded way to hold both truths at once: God never lies, and people often get it wrong. Learning to say both sentences in the same breath is where healthy prophetic practice begins.

Leave a comment