In the Jewish tradition, the prophet Isaiah was not merely a solitary seer with parchment in hand, but a figure deeply enmeshed in the scribal and spiritual life of his time. According to Bava Batra 15a, a passage in the Babylonian Talmud, it was Hezekiah and his men who wrote—or, more likely, compiled—the book of Isaiah. The image this conjures is not that of a lone prophet locked in a study, but of a communal literary endeavor, drawing on sermons, songs, judgments, and consolations, gathered and curated over time.
We see something similar in the book of Proverbs. “These are also proverbs of Solomon which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah copied” (Prov. 25:1). Even here, wisdom was preserved not only in the saying, but in the faithful hands of those who knew how to arrange and transmit it. Sacred literature was not always linear; often it was layered, accreted, and bound together with care. The prophetic word may have come in flashes and burdens, but its preservation was no less inspired than its delivery.
This mosaic-like structure is even more apparent in books like Jeremiah. The text of Jeremiah, as many scholars have noted, appears in dramatically different order in the Septuagint (LXX) than in the Masoretic Text (MT). The content, broadly speaking, remains consistent—sermons of warning, visions of destruction, laments over Judah—but the sequence varies, suggesting a tradition that was shaped and reshaped over time. Rather than undermining the unity of Jeremiah’s message, these variant arrangements reveal how prophecy was a living tradition, not a static transcript.
All this brings us, inevitably, to Isaiah 40.
A Second Voice?
To read Isaiah 40 after the first 39 chapters is to experience a tonal shift so sudden it can feel like stepping into another room—or onto another planet. Gone is the fiery rhetoric of judgment, the language of woe and indictment. In its place, we find something tender, resonant, and almost liturgical: “Comfort, O comfort my people, says your God. Speak tenderly to Jerusalem…” (Isa. 40:1–2).
For many critical scholars, this marks the clear beginning of Deutero-Isaiah, a so-called second Isaiah writing in a later era—most likely during the Babylonian exile. The argument is familiar: the historical context shifts, the tone softens, the horizon widens. Chapter 40 no longer addresses Jerusalem’s immediate sins but points toward future restoration.
Does this undeniable shift in tone require us to divide the authorship? Not necessarily. There is another, equally plausible—and far more theologically satisfying—way to read this change.
One Prophet, Multiple Seasons
Isaiah may well have authored what we now call “First Isaiah” (chapters 1–39) and “Second Isaiah” (chapters 40–66) as distinct works—distinct in occasion, tone, and structure, but not in authorship. To put it plainly: different books, same hand.
The analogy to the Psalms is instructive. King David penned songs of triumph and songs of despair. He wrote of shepherding and kingship, of betrayal and repentance. The stylistic variance between Psalm 23 and Psalm 51 is vast, but no one questions their mutual authorship. The difference is not in inspiration but in season. David was one man, but he lived many lives.
So too with Isaiah. In one chapter, he is the firebrand judge, roaring against idols and injustice. In another, he is the gentle comforter, promising valleys raised and rough places made plain (Isa. 40:4). What changed was not the prophet, but the moment to which he spoke.
The Apostle Paul wrote in a similar way. To the Corinthians, he thundered warnings and corrected scandal. To the Philippians, he sang of joy. The same apostle. Different burdens.
A Prophet for All Seasons
If we permit ourselves to see Isaiah not as a monolithic work but as an anthology—multiple volumes of a singular prophetic ministry—we gain more than just doctrinal coherence. We gain insight into the very nature of how God speaks.
There are seasons for judgment. And there are seasons for comfort. A faithful prophet must be fluent in both.
Isaiah’s early chapters are consumed with Assyria, injustice, rebellion, and the looming judgment of exile. But beginning in chapter 40, the context shifts. Now the enemy is Babylon. The exile has come—or is seen as if it has come—and comfort must follow. God is not only judge; he is redeemer. The sovereign One who wounds is also the One who heals.
This dual ministry—judgment and consolation—is not a contradiction. It is the rhythm of covenantal love.
Disconnection or Distinctiveness?
To say Isaiah 40 is “disconnected” from the earlier chapters is to misunderstand the function of prophetic literature. Yes, the tone changes. Yes, the imagery expands. But the thematic spine remains: the sovereignty of God, the sinfulness of man, and the hope of redemption.
Consider the genre of covenant lawsuit, which appears in both sections (e.g., Isa. 1 and 41). The divine courtroom appears again and again in Isaiah’s scroll. So do other motifs: the holiness of God, the futility of idols, the call for justice, the promise of restoration. These threads run through both volumes like veins of gold in stone.
What we are seeing is not a new author but a new chapter in a faithful prophet’s vocation. And perhaps, in preaching, we would do well to treat these chapters accordingly.
Preaching Isaiah 40 as Its Own Volume
If Isaiah 40 marks the beginning of a new movement—akin to Book Two of the Psalter—then perhaps it deserves to be preached not merely as a continuation of chapter 39 but as a work in its own right. As with the Psalms, where each psalm is its own poetic theology, Isaiah 40 stands as a liturgical overture to the second half of the book.
That does not mean we sever it from its surroundings. Rather, we acknowledge its distinctiveness while still tracing its connection to the whole. Just as Paul’s letters are contextual yet consistent, so Isaiah’s volumes speak with a unified prophetic voice.
Isaiah 40 in the Drama of Redemption
Where, then, does Isaiah 40 fit into the grand sweep of redemptive history?
In three places, at least.
First, in its original context, it offers hope to a people facing the terror of Assyria. The threat of 722 BCE—the fall of the northern kingdom—lingered in the southern imagination. Isaiah’s words would have been balm to a weary remnant: “He will feed his flock like a shepherd…” (Isa. 40:11).
Second, the chapter finds near fulfillment in the return from Babylonian exile around 538 BCE. The imagery of highways in the desert, of God coming with might, speaks to a homecoming that was as political as it was theological.
But ultimately, Isaiah 40 prepares the way for something greater.
“A voice cries out: ‘In the wilderness prepare the way of the Lord…’” (Isa. 40:3). All four Gospels cite this as a prophecy of John the Baptist, heralding the arrival of Christ the King. The exiled people would not only return to a ruined city; they would meet their Redeemer in flesh and blood.
Jesus Christ is the climax of Isaiah’s comfort. He is the Servant, the Sovereign, the Suffering One. In him, the glory of the Lord is revealed—and “all people shall see it together” (Isa. 40:5).
One Prophet, One Book, Many Layers
To read Isaiah as one book with many textures is not a compromise—it is a recovery. It honors both the human process of composition and the divine voice behind the text. The tonal shift at chapter 40 is not a fracture but a flourish, the moment where the prophet lays down his gavel and picks up his harp.
And if Isaiah preached both judgment and hope, both fire and comfort, perhaps we too must learn to speak with that same double-edged clarity.
There is one voice behind this text—a voice that cries in the wilderness, calls down nations, and comforts trembling hearts. That voice is Isaiah’s. But it is also, unmistakably, God’s.
Fresh Ground Theology 
Leave a comment